Aye, and not only that, Andrew, but on most of the prints I have the sound is nothing to write home about either.
I always thought that the optical sound on 16mm prints was superior to the magnetic stripe sound on super 8. Mostly based on memories of the stuff that was available in the early 70's super 8 wise, with the muffled sound and the ever-present hum in the background. The 16mm prints we saw at school always seemed to sound clear and strong.
But now I have 16mm I'm beginning to think I was wrong. A case of time and fond memories distorting reality?
So either I must have something wrong with my hearing, or there is something wrong with my 16mm projectors, or 16mm optical sound sucks.
Unfortunately, I don't live near anyone who has 16mm, so with nothing to use as a reference I can't tell which of the three it is.
One other thing I note is that lately there have been lots of prints for sale on ebay advertised as "Good" even though the the vendor hasn't the means to screen the print to check it. Their claim is based solely on the external appearance of the box, reel and first few inches of film. Even where films have been run and checked there is often little or no reference to the sound quality in the description.
To me, sound is as important as the picture. I have no intentions of parting with money, however little the sum, for a print that has not been at least run and checked by the vendor.
Massive reels taking up half my house. projector half a mile away from the screen in order to get an image bigger than a postage stamp ( yes I know I need to buy a zoom lens) , rasping or muffled sound that gets very spiky if the treble is turned up or becomes unintelligible and muffled if the bass is turned up, and folks advertising for sale prints that smell of vinegar, with long slits down the side instead of sprocket holes and are held together by tape. I ask you.
I think maybe I'm cracking up. I hope I haven't offended anyone. Is everyone else happy with the sound they get from 16mm prints?