Wenn Sie hier auf Links zu eBay klicken und einen Kauf tätigen, kann dies dazu führen, dass diese Website eine Provision erhält.
Quote: Paul Browning wrote in post #9
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/404256713343 , i think this is the high end model you are referring too Thomas, but let me say they are not as well made as the high end elmo's the gs1200 . The yelco is the exact same model, but does not have the ability to change the voltage setting in the back of the machine for different country's, well at least the one's i have don't, but this fujicascope does, but the seller doesn't know this or hasn't checked. What i can say is that the japanese machines travel better than its french counter part, and are easier to fix, no complicated tensioning system, take up and rewind mechanism. This sd25 has a tooth belt ,so makes it ideal for rerecording, as good as the GS-1200. Take off the rear cover of both the GS and the SD25 and you will see, they are miles apart in quality of components, the elmo GS-1200 in my opinion set the standard, regarless of what people say about it, for the most part its just sower grapes........
Thanks -- I believe YELCO made several high-end projectors. There was a link I posted here a while ago with 10 pages of mini-reviews of Super 8 projectors. Since I've never had a GS-1200 or any of these high-end YELCOs, I can't comment much based on any personal experience, just what I've read.
The French counterpart you speak of -- would that be a Beaulieu? I've never had one, nor know much about them.
The beauty of the internet is that anyone, anywhere in the world, can write whatever they want about any subject...
So what I've read about the Elmo GS-1200 could very well be heresay. Sour grapes? Perhaps, but the people who I've heard denigrate the GS-1200 claim that they either own one, or have owned one in the past. The common complaint is "over engineered", "hard to fix", "prone to problems", etc. I believe it has 3 motors? What on earth for?
The only advantage that the GS-1200 would have for me, in terms of features, is the 200 watt lamp. The 1.0 lens would be great, too, but I am not sure that all were equipped with the 1.0 lens. I have heard that the 200 watt lamps are only made in limited runs (heresay, perhaps?) -- I'm not even sure how easy they are to obtain now, or how much they cost. I have also heard claims that the 200 watt lamp does not seem that much brighter than a 150 watt lamp. Another complaint: a 1.0 lens makes it harder to keep the screen image in focus.
I can say from experience that I do not notice a 50%+ increase in light output over one of my 100 watt EFP lamp projectors vs. the 150 watt EFR with a 1.1 lens in my Elmo ST-1200HD. A little brighter? Perhaps, but I think you would need to do a side-by-side comparison to really notice.
When I upgraded from the standard 1.3 lens to a 1.1 on my Elmo over 20 years ago, I expected to get my Aunt Connie's socks knocked off. That never happened. Was the picture a little sharper and brighter. I guess so. (I convinced myself it was an improvement since I paid about $200 for the 1.1 lens.)
I can see the reason for some of the bells and whistles on a GS-1200. Back then, it was the equivalent of today's digital video editing software. Today, for me, I use a projector stictly for watching packaged films. I don't re-record. I don't have any films in stereo. I doubt that any projector will make my Blackhawk Laurel and Hardys sound any better. But that's just me and what I collect. To each his own.